Thursday, September 17. 2009Thou shalt not accuse, falsely or otherwiseTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Folded by accident my arse.
The problem is that people who have come up against each other earlier in the tournament may have developed an affinity, especially if they respect each others play. I've been in a situation where I (with a chip lead) have decided that I wanted one guy to make the bubble and not another because the other guy had made a bad call and got lucky (not even against me). That's perfectly allowable and not cheating at all, but (to a casual observer) my behaviour would seem highly suspect. Comments (2)
An interesting point.
If you were selectively choosing which players you attempted to knock out because you felt you had a bigger edge by trying to keep the fish alive, or if you declined to call an all-in on the bubble because you felt you could win more chips by abusing others who are playing scared, these are certainly valid tactics which could still look like unusual play to an observer. As you say, this is indeed what could have happened to me, although it's extremely difficult to build any kind of rapport with the other players, or make any play that could gain you respect in a 30 minute turbo SNG shove-fest. However, in the situation you've described, it sounds like you're playing God. You're showing favour to one player over another by making decisions differently to how you normally would and with no strategic benefit to yourself. To be honest, I'm not sure how I feel about this. On the one hand, you won those chips, they represent your money and you can do whatever you like with them. If you choose to play this way, that's fine as long as you're OK with giving up equity to play out a personal vendetta. On the other hand, you have to remember that in a tournament every decision affects every player, not just those involved in the hand at the time. You're not only having an effect on the fortune of the player you're picking on, but also the other guy stuck in the middle, who should have already had a shot at making the money. It's technically allowable, but it's not exactly gentlemanly. imo, obviously. Comment (1)
I'm not sure about "with no strategic benefit to yourself": I don't want to be playing at the final table with some donkey who is likely to make a horrible call against me and suck out.
But yes, in that particular instance it was mainly because the first guy had been playing well and had got a bit unlucky and the second guy was a complete donkey and it was one of those rare occasions where I had enough chips to play God. Comments (2)
Add Comment
|
Calendar
QuicksearchArchivesCategories
Blog AdministrationPowered byCopyright |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


